Edilex-palvelut

Kirjaudu sisään

Pääsy PDF-dokumenttiin vaatii sisäänkirjautumisen.

Vertaisarvioitu

How Does One Lock-Up a Friendly Deal After Omnicare v. NCS?

Rehula, Tero

Helsinki Law Review 1/2015 s. 74–97
25.6.2015
Opiskelijakirjoitus

Tiivistelmä

Deal protection devices are contractual terms in a merger agreement. They motivate parties to consummate the underlying transaction. The Delaware Supreme Court held in its 2003 decision, Omnicare Inc. v. NCS Healthcare Inc. (“Omnicare”), by a 3 to 2 vote, that the NCS board had breached its fiduciary duties by accepting deal protection devices that created “an absolute lock-up”.2 The Omnicare decision created a new legal rule: the target board has to retain an effective fiduciary out provision that allows the board to terminate the deal if it receives a superior proposal from another company. However, due to other courts’ narrow construction of Omnicare and practitioners’ creative crafting of new deal protection devices, there is a good reason to believe that Omnicare has limited applicability today.

Lisää muistilistalle

Muuta kansioita

Dokumentti ei ole muistilistallasi. Lisää se valittuun tai uuteen kansioon.

Lisää dokumentti kansioihin tai poista se jo liitetyistä kansioista.

Lisää uusi kansio.

Lisää uusi väliotsikko.